The filmed version of “Hills Like Elephants” reflects how the director
Question The filmed version of “Hills Like Elephants” reflects how the director understood the book’s conflict, theme, setting, etc. Does this film differ from your interpretation of the story? In what way? Did any part of the video help you to understand the text better? Did you disagree with any of the director’s choices? Why?
Get Answer Mill – Utilitarianism
1. Mill describes several objections that have been made against utilitarianism, and he tries to
Question Get Answer Mill – Utilitarianism
1. Mill describes several objections that have been made against utilitarianism, and he tries to defend the theory from those objections. Explain one of those objections and Mill’s response to it. Shafer-Landau – Consequentialism 2. Shafer-Landau describes some common misunderstandings of Mill’s moral principle. What is the moral principle? Describe one of the misunderstandings. 3. Shafer-Landau explains the distinction between actual and expected results. Why is this significant? Describe a situation that illustrates the importance of the distinction.4. Describe two of things that Shafer-Landau finds attractive about utilitarianism.
Think about a leader in whom you trust. Why do you trust them? Consider the following guiding questions in preparing
Think about a leader in whom you trust. Why do you trust them? Consider the following guiding questions in preparing your response: Can you recall a specific interaction or incident that made you trust them more? How does your trust in them affect the way that you listen, respond to, and act on what they say?
Peer Assessment Questionnaire / Slide Presentation Initial Draft / Mod 2 / RWS 305W-37 S2 2020 Introductory Note: Though we should
Peer Assessment Questionnaire / Slide Presentation Initial Draft / Mod 2 / RWS 305W-37 S2 2020 Introductory Note: Though we should anticipate that many class members will produce drafts of slides that cover Section 1 (Presentation Introduction and Purpose) and Section 2 (Investigating the Rhetorical Situation and Strategies in a Text for a Non-Expert Audience), it is likely that class members may include drafts of slides for other Sections. Consequently, I am going to provide a list of questions that allow for open-ended responses. Please select 6 of the following 8 questions and respond to them in relation to your peer’s initial draft. I would recommend that before selecting 6 questions, please take about 5 minutes to “view” your group member’s work. After doing this, it may become apparent that some questions would be more appropriate than others to respond to. 1. What do you appreciate about your peer’s draft Slide Presentation? And, why do you appreciate these specific features? 2. Viewers of the Slide Presentation may not be familiar with the Module 2 Presentation assignment. What gives you the impression that your peer is presenting information in a way that would be understandable to non-experts (or people who are unfamiliar with the issue)? 3. Each slide is expected to accomplish a certain goal or present a specific piece of information about the expert or non-expert audience text. What gives you the impression that each slide contains sufficient information to identify the focus/topic of the slide? 4. For the slides that have been drafted, what gives you the impression that they are easy to read? Or conversely, if there features of one or more slides that may make it challenging to read/view information presented on them, please identify those features here. Consider commenting on font style, font size, font color, font-background contrast, and/or amount of text per slide. 5. What gives you the impression that viewers will find the Slide Presentation visually appealing and engaging? Conversely, if it has been challenging for you to engage with the initial draft’s visual features, please offer your peer two recommendations for enhancing the presentation’s visual appeal. 6. At this point, would you be more inclined to describe information presented in the initial draft as “well-organized,” “usually easy to follow,” or “presenting challenges”? Please take two sentences to explain your characterization of how information is arranged in your peer’s draft. 7. 0ne of the benefits of peer review is being able to learn more about how other class members who have the same assignment as you have attempted to accomplish their task. So, what are two aspects of your peer’s presentation that you would consider integrating into your own Slide Presentation between now and the final draft? Please briefly explain why you might incorporate these two features into your own work. 8. When you peer receives your commentary, they will have approximately 4-6 days to revise their initial draft. From your view, what are two features of their slide-based analysis of two texts’ rhetorical situations and strategies that need additional attention or development? Briefly explain why you selected these two features. Once you finish, please 1. Email your set of responses to your peer. 2. Submit through Blackboard your set of responses. The submission portal can be located under Module 2 Texts
The first assessment is designed to introduce common decision-making practices in business, as well as their shortcomings. As Christians, we
The first assessment is designed to introduce common decision-making practices in business, as well as their shortcomings. As Christians, we are called to be in the world, but not of it (John 15:19). Our worldview impacts every part of our life, including school, family, friends, work, etc. – all of which are influenced by the decisions that we make Now, prepare a 1-2 page paper summarizing what you learned about the importance of effective decision-making skills. How does your faith affect the decisions that you make and the process by which you make them?
Sociologists use research to collect information about society and apply their findings to everyday life to better understand the human
Sociologists use research to collect information about society and apply their findings to everyday life to better understand the human condition. Sociologists can investigate people in their natural environments by becoming part of their everyday settings to observe and study participants. Imagine that you are a practicing sociologist who is researching the behavior of social groups in social settings. Conduct a participant observation in a setting where a group of people gather. Examples of places with groups include malls, grocery stores, libraries, restaurants, coffee shops, parks, schools, employee break rooms, parking lots, pubs, sporting events, or your local neighborhood. Station yourself in a safe location where you can observe participants for 60 minutes without having to approach or engage the public. You are just observing people, not interacting with them. DUE TO THE CORONO VIRUS (COVID-19) please review a favorite tv show to observe group behavior. This can include an hour drama, 30 minute sitcom, an hour of your favorite movie, a documentary etc. The results is to view group behavior. (sanford and son, different stroke Cosby show is my favorite Use the Field Study Observation Template to collect field notes on the following data about the individuals in your observation, as you perceive it:
1- Ch. 11 – Managing Conflict: Conflict is inevitable. Some of us can confront conflict head on, but others of
1- Ch. 11 – Managing Conflict: Conflict is inevitable. Some of us can confront conflict head on, but others of us avoid it at all costs. Think about someone you experience conflict with. How do you handle it? Be objective rather than emotional in your description. Based on what you read about in the chapter, what steps could you take to improve the situation? (minimum 150 words) 2- In the video Dare to Disagree, Margaret Heffernan describes a research team and why it worked so well. Why might you seek out someone who will dare to disagree with you? What are the challenges you would face in having or being that person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PY_kd46RfVE (minimum 150 words)
Lying is a part of keeping the social structure intact ?
INFO: Requirements: 5 pages, double spaced, 12 pt Times New Roman font, MLA page numbering and heading, title, 5 sources on the annotated bibliography page Set-Up: Arguing about a concept in academia can be a challenge. Research is necessary in order to make sure that your readers HEAR you. The goal for any academic argument is to be HEARD, not to “win” or make more sense than the opposition. It also requires you, the author, to recognize the opposition to your argument. Activity: Students will construct a 5-page argumentative research paper, complete with an annotated bibliography of sources used Students will take a stance either agreeing or disagreeing with the chosen topic and lay out their claim and evidence and counterarguments throughout the paper. Pointers: 1) Do not “list” citations within the text. Piling quotes on top of each other just shows me that you can pick quotes. I am more interested in how you USE citations and quotes to support your claim. REMEMBER, this is YOUR claim, NOT THE SOURCES’ CLAIM. 2) Your counterargument is NOT 2 sentences and then move on. You should be very familiar with the counter against your claim. That means explaining the counterargument, explaining HOW it exists, and then WHY it falls short based on your claim. You are NOT undermining your claim by doing this, you are showing that you understand your topic THOROUGHLY and can dismiss it. 3) Your conclusion should answer the almighty common question: WHY does this topic and also your claim about it MATTER?
Essay Writing at AllEssays.Online
Review This Service