Children often come from varying relationships. They are sons, daughters, cousins, grandchildren, students, or even wards. These relationships are dynamic,
Children often come from varying relationships. They are sons, daughters, cousins, grandchildren, students, or even wards. These relationships are dynamic, and as children age they establish their identity and individuality independent of others. At the same time, children typically rely on others for guidance and support. The goal of a child’s developmental process is to reach adulthood having the ability to act independently and responsibly in the context of established relationships such as the family. This is important to consider when selecting treatment approaches and providing treatment to juvenile offenders. In addition, it is important to consider the benefits and liabilities of involving the family or supportive adults in the treatment of juvenile offenders. To prepare for this Assignment, consider the role and importance of family in the treatment of juvenile offenders. The Assignment (1–2 pages): Explain the role and importance of family in the treatment of juvenile offenders. Be specific. Explain how forensic treatment practitioners can involve family in the treatment of juvenile offenders. Then, explain the benefits and challenges to the family’s involvement. Use examples from the resources and from your own research to illustrate your points. Support your Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to provide a reference list only for those resources not included in the resources for this course. Treatment Outcome Models The Case of Sandy:Sandy Lee is a 28-year-old woman who was arrested and convicted of trafficking in cocaine.
Which two of the 6 principles of scientific thinking?
Question Which two of the 6 principles of scientific thinking?
a) analyze the claims being made according to 2 of the above 6 principles of scientific thinking. It may be the case that the research does a good job of following some of these 6 scientific principles, but does not good job of following others. If you think the research does a good job of following one of the principles that you have chosen to about (e.g. you think it does a good job in ruling our rival hypotheses), provide a detailed response as to why you think that. If you think the research does not good job of following one of the principles (e.g. it fails to consider rival hypotheses), please provide a comprehensive answer and say what would need to be done to make sure the research follows the principle (e.g. what the rival hypotheses might be and how they might be ruled out). You will probably find that you have more interesting material if you try to look for the ways that the research fails to follow a scientific principle, than if you look for the ways it succeeds. In other words, try to find what the researcher did wrong rather than what they did right. The research description has been specially created so that it fails to abide by some – but not all – of these scientific principles. The six guiding principles are:1) Ruling out rival hypotheses: Findings consistent with several differenthypotheses need additional research to decide which hypothesis is bestsupported. When looking at a pattern of results that has been reported, it isimportant to ask “are there any alternative hypotheses that could explain thispattern of data?” The rival hypotheses that are most important to rule out arethose that could also explain the specific results that have been described. It isuseful to consider how we could attempt to rule out these alternative hypotheses.2) Correlation vs. causation: An association between two things does not implya cause and effect relationship. If a pattern of results was produced simply bymeasuring two different things and comparing them, we cannot say anythingdefinitive about whether one of these things caused the other. It’s alwaysimportant to ask whether the causal connection that is claimed or implied (e.g. Acauses B) could be reversed (i.e. B causes A) or whether a third variable couldexplain the relationship (i.e. C causes A and B to go together).3) Falsifiability: Claims must be capable of being disproved. In other words, weshould be able to think of a way to test whether or not a claim is true. If the claimis made in such a way that there’s no good way to test it, the claim is not reallyscientific.4) Replicability: Findings must be capable of being duplicated following thesame methodology. In addition, the most reliable claims are those that haveconverging evidence for them. We can only really be confident in a claim if it hasbeen tested in multiple different ways and all of them point to the same effect.5) Extraordinary claims: Science is, for the most part, a cumulative process,where new claims represent small advances over older ones. A claim thatcontradicts what we already know, or that seems to promise radical new benefits,must have a lot of evidence to back it up. The bigger the claim, the moreevidence must be provided.SCENARIOCatching Fire: How to improve your Instagram pictureIt’s Saturday night and you decide to upload a new picture on Instagram. After spendingan hour deciding on which selfie to post, you select one that is clearly superior to therest of the fifty or so selfies that you had taken. You post the picture thinking that youwill get over a hundred likes at least from your Instagram followers in the next half hour,but you are soon proven wrong when your picture only receives a measly 15 likes.Did I post the wrong picture? How could I possibly know which selfie would result in megetting the most likes? A recent study done by researchers at Ohio University havedetermined a procedure that will ensure that whatever selfie you post, you will receivethe maximum number of likes!Dr. Haymitch Abernathy conducted an experiment and stated: “Ensuring the maximumnumber of likes and comments on a picture simply comes down to perception. If youincrease the specificity of photons hitting your viewers’ retinas, you can increase thelikelihood of getting a like! This is done by manipulating the photons in the picture,which leads to the release of oxytocin by the hypothalamus, therefore increasing yourInstagram followers’ positive feelings towards your photo.” This unique procedure hasoriginated from Dr. Abernathy’s laboratory, where his research team has spent the lastsix months fine-tuning a filter that will increase the specificity of photons, which he callsa “scattered-light filter.”The researchers conducted an experiment to determine what type of selfie led to themost number of likes. Dr. Abernathy recruited 30 females from his IntroductoryPsychology class who were between the ages of 18 and 22. Participants in the studywere brought into the lab at Ohio University, and they had their photos taken using ascattered-light filter on a high-quality, digital camera. They were then asked to post theirpicture whenever they wanted on their Instagram account for a 24 hour period and keeptrack of how many likes and comments they received in that time. Participants were alsoasked to report how quickly – in comparison to other pictures they posted – theyreceived likes and comments on their photo.The findings were astounding! The pictures taken using the scattered-light filter on the digital camera resulted in almost twice the number of comments and likes than each of the participants’ last uploaded selfie. Dr. Abernathy explains that this result can be explained by the fact that when light waves have been scattered, they have deeper penetration into a viewer’s eyeball, and stimulate the retina more specifically. This increase in specificity results in an increase in positive perception, and an increased likelihood of liking a picture. Sarah, one of the participants in the study, stated that “I’ve never received so many likes and comments on a picture, and so rapidly as well! I’m definitely going to purchase one of these filters to use from now on!Dr. Abernathy says that this study proves that by manipulating the photon specificity of the light being projected by your picture, you can ensure that you receive the maximum number of likes and comments on your Instagram photos.
My topic will be on Prejudice and Discrimination. Prejudice, discrimination, and stereotypes occur in any social group. I will be concerned in
My topic will be on Prejudice and Discrimination. Prejudice, discrimination, and stereotypes occur in any social group. I will be concerned in the root, causes, and effects of these types. This paper is not report or a literature review; it is an opinion piece. So please review lecture slides on the topic and read op-eds available in your favorite magazines or newspapers I will post all the information bellow
HUMAN SUBJECTS: How has research on human subjects changed?
Question HUMAN SUBJECTS: How has research on human subjects changed?
-research an academic article (i.e. peer-reviewed) of a scientific experiment with human subjects that would VIOLATE CURRENT APA ETHICAL STANDARDS -Briefly summarize your experiment in a post. Include a summary of the study itself (topic, method, results) as well as why you think this study is unethical. -discuss whether or not Facebook was conducting unethical research, and how you personally feel as a potential research subject -Explain why your identified experiment would be considered unethical by today’s standards -Provide reference (Author, Year Published, Title of Article, Journal Name)Provide a 1.5 summary of the study, what ethics code violation you believe occurred, as well as any valuable findings from the study, in addition to your response to the Facebook research.
Type “propaganda ads” in a search engine and review the Images section of the results. Select a political propaganda advertisement
Type “propaganda ads” in a search engine and review the Images section of the results. Select a political propaganda advertisement to evaluate. Consider the ethical standards for political persuasion. Think about the role of symbols used in persuasion. How are symbols ethically or unethically used in propaganda to achieve persuasive communication? Submit a 3-page paper in which you explain the use of propaganda in your selected political advertisement. Then, explain how the symbols in your selected political propaganda advertisement adhere to or violate ethical standards. Include the image of the advertisement you chose. References should come from: Larson, C. U. (2013). Persuasion: Reception and responsibility (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth. Chapter 2, “Perspectives on Ethics in Persuasion” “Importance of Ethics” (pp. 41–47) “Ethical Standards for Political Persuasion” (pp. 55–68) Chapter 2 focuses on the importance of ethical issues and standards in the persuasion process. Chapter 5, “The Making, Use, and Misuse of Symbols” (pp. 119–142) Chapter 5 explores the role of symbols used in persuasive messages. It explains the power of metaphors in persuasion and provides a model for analyzing and creating them.
Essay Writing at AllEssays.Online
Review This Service