Get help from the best in academic writing.

Hello there, I am here asking for help to writing an letter assignment.

Question Get Answer Hello there, I am here asking for help to writing an letter assignment. But right now I am confused on finding a specific audience to begin with. I can not find any one who is really against AI or fully agree on using AI on scans for diseases. Can you help me out please?The topic I choose is Artificial Intelligence: Should we rely on AI to interpret/screen x-rays/scans for diseases? And here is the type of assignment I am being asked to write:Rogerian ArgumentWhen most of us think of argument, we think about winners of arguments and losers of arguments. Arguments, even sometimes academic arguments, can be strong and forceful. An Aristotelian or classical argument is a strong, “this is my assertion and here’s why I am right” kind of argument. But that kind of argument isn’t going to work in all situations. When your audience is a really difficult one in the sense that you know your audience isn’t going to completely agree with your side of the issue, it can be a good idea to try to find a middle ground. The Rogerian argument finds that middle ground.Based on the work of psychologist Carl Rogers (pictured on the right), a Rogerian argument focuses on finding a middle ground between the author and the audience. This type of argument can be extremely persuasive and can help you, as a writer, understand your own biases and how you might work to find common ground with others.Here is a summary of the basic strategy for a Rogerian argument, and the infographic on the following page should be helpful as well. -In your essay, first, introduce the problem. -Acknowledge the other side before you present your side of the issue. This may take several paragraphs. -Next, you should carefully present your side of the issue in a way that does not dismiss the other side. This may also take several paragraphs. -You should then work to bring the two sides together. Help your audience see the benefits of the middle ground. Make your proposal for the middle ground here, and be sure to use an even, respectful tone. This should be a key focus of your essay and may take several paragraphs. -Finally, in your conclusion, remind your audience of the balanced perspective you have presented and make it clear how both sides benefit when they meet in the middle.

If gun laws are enforced, then guns will be hard to obtain.

Question Get Answer

If gun laws are enforced, then guns will be hard to obtain. If guns are hard to obtain, then we won’t be able to defend ourselves against terrorism. Therefore, if gun laws are enforced, then we won’t be able to defend against terrorism.A = Gun laws are enforced.B = Guns will be hard to obtain. C = We won’t be able to defend ourselves against terrorism.construct a truth table, is it valid or invalided

the people of San Luis Obispo are very involved in the governance

Question Get Answer the people of San Luis Obispo are very involved in the governance of their community. “With more citizen participation, the town’s focus shifted away from optimizing the business environment o maximizing quality of life” (p. 200).If you were empowered to make changes in your local community regarding green spaces, traffic, pollution, and the arts, what would you do? What is keeping you from doing it now?

In THRIVE Buettner reveals that “a recent study carried out by Gallup-Healthways

PhilosophyQuestion Get Answer In THRIVE Buettner reveals that “a recent study carried out by Gallup-Healthways shows that social time massively affects day-to-day happiness. It suggests that for most people spending six to seven hours in social time each day helps to maximize their well-being” (p. 137).Compare your work schedule to your social schedule. How many hours do you put in at your work and school studies each day? How often do you get together with friends and neighbors? Are you as productive socially as you are in your work and school studies? What do you think your annual social review would be like? What would you like to change over the next five years in these respects?

In THRIVE, Buettner states that he sees a large difference in the

Question Get Answer In THRIVE, Buettner states that he sees a large difference in the makeup of Asians as opposed to Americans. “For Asians, striving for personal happiness appears to be a vaguely impolite and selfish concept that falls somewhere near the bottom of a list of lifetime goals. For Asians, the individual exists only in the context of his family and community. The individual is not separate. He is often driven toward perfection, but not for personal gain as much as to live up to societal expectations, and to make his mother proud” (p. 114).Create a list of what you strive for in terms of achieving happiness. Note in this list how many of these items are for personal reasons, how many of these items are geared toward society, and how many are geared to family. What would you like to change about this list over the next five years?

. What does Mills mean by his thesis that “most humans were not and

Question Get Answer . What does Mills mean by his thesis that “most humans were not and are not socially recognized persons…most persons are non-persons”? Is he endorsing this idea, or is he merely stating it as a fact? How so? Do you find his thesis persuasive? Why or why not?

In “Conscription of Cadaveric Organs for Transplant: A Stimulating Idea Whose Time Has Not Yet Come”, Aaron Spital argues

Question In “Conscription of Cadaveric Organs for Transplant: A Stimulating Idea Whose Time Has Not Yet Come”, Aaron Spital argues we should work towards conscription of cadaveric organs.a) Explain Spital’s proposal carefully, accurately, and b) provide an argument, independent of those Spital offers, that draws on one or more of the ethical theories we’ve studied to support or reject his proposal.

Start with the premise of a quote from Greek philosopher, Socrates

Question Start with the premise of a quote from Greek philosopher, Socrates , “The unexamined life is not worth living.” Craft an essay examining the meanings of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave and Aristotle’s High-Minded Man. Describe how these two readings might compare to each other, and more importantly, how they have a bearing on your life…keeping in mind the statement from Socrates.

Essay Writing at Allessays.Online

4.9 rating based on 17,037 ratings

17037 reviews

Review This Service




Rating: