Get help from the best in academic writing.

Forensic science is the application of science to criminal and civil laws that are enforced by police agencies in a Law Assignment Help

Forensic science is the application of science to criminal and civil laws that are enforced by police agencies in a criminal justice system.  Forensic science owes its origins to individuals such as Bertillon, Galton, Lattes, Goddard, Osborn, and Locard, who developed the principles and techniques needed to identify and compare physical evidence. Locard’s exchange principle states that, when two objects come into contact with each other, a cross-transfer of materials occurs that can connect a criminal suspect to his or her victim. Research the following points, and write a 5–7-page paper fully explaining each point: 1. Define forensic science, and explain how it is used in criminal justice. 2. What was the name of the first system of personal identification? What criteria did it use to distinguish individuals?  Explain how this was used and whether it is still used today. 3. Explain Francis Henry Galton’s major contribution to forensic science. 4. Who is known as the father of forensic toxicology, and why? 5. Name and explain 2 major contributions to forensic science made by Hans Gross.

Mr. Oaks has worked as the CEO of Turley Bank for the last three years.

Question Mr. Oaks has worked as the CEO of Turley Bank for the last three years. This past year, the outside auditor discovered some fraudulent loan activity in which Mr. Oaks was circumventing internal controls to lend money to friends and family. After a thorough investigation, the board of trustees concluded that Mr. Oaks had committed more than $10 million in loan fraud. Mr. Oaks denied any wrongdoing. Now, the board is contemplating pursuing a civil case against Mr. Oaks, seeking repayment of the $10 million.1. What are some reasons why Turley Bank would not pursue a civil case against Mr. Oaks?2. If Turley Bank decides to pursue a civil case against Mr. Oaks, what are some reasons why the bank would settle out of court before the actual trial?3. If Turley Bank decides to pursue a civil case against Mr. Oaks, what are some reasons why Mr. Oaks would settle out of court before the actual trial?

Get Answer QUESTION 27
1. True or False: Engaging in passive listening during the interview is important to building good

Question Get Answer QUESTION 27
1. True or False: Engaging in passive listening during the interview is important to building good rapport. a. True b. False QUESTION 281. True or False: Slang or jargon used by the witness during an interview should be clarified by the interviewer the moment the term is used rather than waiting until the end of the interview. a. True b. False QUESTION 291. True or False: Tact is valuable during the interview process, particularly when it comes to discussing uncomfortable events. It is best to avoid the term rape when interviewing a client who just experienced a near rape incident. a. True b. False QUESTION 301. Jane is a paralegal with the firm of Smith

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches of their property and persons. It also prevents law enforcement from making

LawThe Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches of their property and persons. It also prevents law enforcement from making unlawful arrests/seizures. It requires that all searches be reasonable. This forum asks you to examine the requirements for a search warrant and the exceptions to needing a warrant. Please thoroughly discuss each of the following: Discuss when a search warrant is needed by law enforcement. Discus what law enforcement must demonstrate to a judge to have a search warrant issue. Discuss the various exceptions to the search warrant requirement. Please include examples of each in your response. 250 words please answer each question and give examples

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff               VS. Scott Mayo, Defendant TYPE OF CASE-Criminal SUMMARY OF FACTS Scott Mayo worked as a bartender at

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff               VS. Scott Mayo, Defendant TYPE OF CASE-Criminal SUMMARY OF FACTS Scott Mayo worked as a bartender at The Local Watering Hole. One night at work, Scott got into an argument with Basil Scowen. Mayo owed Scowen $1500.00. The argument heated up and, after Scowen picked up a beer bottle threateningly and appeared to be intoxicated, Mayo grabbed a pistol kept behind the bar and fired at Scowen, killing him. Mayo says Scowen told him, “I am going to kill you,” and what he believed was imminent danger from Scowen.  Mayo was placed under arrest. He was not read his rights. He was transported to the local county jail. The prosecution witnesses are the police officer, who came to the scene and took statements from Mayo, and a frequent bar customer, Dawn Dietz, who witnessed some of what happened. The defense witnesses are the defendant, Mayo, and Joe, “the fireman”, who was outside and saw some of the action through the window while sitting on the patio use this scenario to answer these questions   Using the facts provided to you in the week one discussion forum #2, answer the following questions : 1) Was the arrest of Mayo a legal arrest? Discuss why. Please include the components of a reasonable arrest and whether or not they were met with Mayo. 2) Did law enforcement need an arrest warrant prior to arresting Mayo? Discuss why. Make sure to support your thoughts. 3) Can law enforcement seize the broken beer bottle and the gun without a search warrant? 250 words

Chapter 10 explains that many crisis situations are the result of poor ethical decisions in an organization. It recommends that

Chapter 10 explains that many crisis situations are the result of poor ethical decisions in an organization. It recommends that the organizational culture be changed to improve the ethical climate of the agency.  Using the suggestions on how to change the culture, identify what steps could be taken to improve your local law enforcement organization.  If you believe that there is no reason for culture change, explain why using the same steps and identify why you believe the organization is prepared.

Assessment One Part A: Choose one of the following cases to read and summarise.  Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 Roach

Assessment One Part A: Choose one of the following cases to read and summarise.  Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162 Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services (NT) v JWB and SMB (Marion’s Case) (1992) 175 CLR 218 A Solicitor v Law Society of New South Wales (2004) 216 CLR 253 Briefly outline the procedural history, material facts, legal issues and judgment/s (reasons for the decision and dissenting judgments if there are any). Is the case still current law? If so, give an example of how it has been applied since.  (1000 words: 25%)

Essay Writing at Allessays.Online

4.9 rating based on 17,037 ratings

17037 reviews

Review This Service




Rating: