Learning a language is not a task that is achieved in one semester; it is a life-long endeavor. Being able
Learning a language is not a task that is achieved in one semester; it is a life-long endeavor. Being able to communicate in another language means connecting with its speakers in an intimate and powerful way. When someone uses your native language to speak to you, the walls that seemed to divide you both begin to dissipate. One does not need perfect speech to achieve this; oftentimes, the simple attempt is enough. The purpose of this class is to equip you with the tools and resources so that you can continue your language journey, a journey that has no end. That said, learning a language is particularly challenging. Some might say it is the most difficult task that they will attempt. As college instructors, we are gate keepers. It is our duty to ensure that all students are held to the same standard and that they master the concepts that the course is designed to teach. All students must go through the same process. However, in their attempt to reach their destination more easily, some choose to take shortcuts. In the academic setting, we call this academic dishonesty. It is the instructor’s responsibility to ensure students develop responsibility and integrity. This is achieved when students complete their own work without the aid of anyone or anything except the materials and tools that the instructors provides or allows. In our course, you should access your textbook, course lecture notes and videos, and an online or print Spanish-English dictionary. An online dictionary that you may use is WordReference (wordreference.com). Students are forbidden from using online translators to translate complete sentences. Use of online translators equates to cheating. As the instructor of this course, it is my ethical duty to investigate any suspicion of cheating. If I come to believe that a student has used an online translator to translate a complete sentence, I will contact the student and set up a conference call to investigate the suspicion. Our institution and department take academic integrity very seriously. I highly discourage you from using an online translator, since it is unethical, dishonest and its use is obvious to a specialist of the language. Answer each question in a minimum of three (3) sentences for a total of more than 12 sentences. 1) How would you define integrity? 2) What role does integrity play in the academic setting? 3) Why do some students choose to cheat or plagiarize? Is there ever a valid reason for committing acts of academic dishonesty? Why or why not? 4) How does academic dishonesty ultimately hurt the learning process?
1- Encontrar el significado del siguiente glosario. 1- Análisis de discurso escrito 2- Introspección 3- Dimensión 4- Limitación 5- Finalidad 2- Escriba un ensayo con el
1- Encontrar el significado del siguiente glosario. 1- Análisis de discurso escrito 2- Introspección 3- Dimensión 4- Limitación 5- Finalidad 2- Escriba un ensayo con el siguiente tema: La importancia de discurso escrito, sus dimensiones, limitaciones y finalidad. En este ensayo no debe hablar de tu, ni yo, se debe utilizar solo el “se” personal. ejemplo usted como enfermera podrías narrar de esta manera. En el campo de la enfermería el discurso es importante porque….. no debe decir yo como enfermera. 3- Escriba una reflexión sobre este nuevo curso spanol 115, la tarea y sus expectativas no uses menos de 250 palabras. toda esta tarea debe ser en un documento y tiene que estar en estilo APA con referencia.
Why does Homer stress that neither gods nor men can change outcomes
Question Why does Homer stress that neither gods nor men can change outcomes for his audience? Remember that the purpose of an epic poem is to teach the audience important things about cultural, social, and religious practices. The audience would have been familiar with the myths associated with the war, so these characters and events are not new. However, Homer is unique in his manner of telling these stories—that is Achilles is his character in this poem and he gives this character and others unique language patterns, character descriptions and actions.
Sherman Alexie, a Spokane/Coeur d’Alene poet and novelist, was born on October 7, 1966, on the Spokane Indian
Question Sherman Alexie
Sherman Alexie, a Spokane/Coeur d’Alene poet and novelist, was born on October 7, 1966, on the Spokane Indian Reservation in Wellpinit, Washington. He received his BA in American studies from Washington State University in Pullman.His books of poetry include Face (Hanging Loose, 2009), One Stick Song (2000), The Man Who Loves Salmon (1998), The Summer of Black Widows (1996), Water Flowing Home (1995), Old Shirts
-Consider “At the Corner of Love and Basketball” as a tragedy
Question Get Answer
-Consider “At the Corner of Love and Basketball” as a tragedy as defined by Aristotle. List, using our class notes, Aristotle’s six elements of his definition of tragedy (This is NOT the same as the characteristics of the tragic hero). Next to each element that is fulfilled by “At the Corner of Love and Basketball,” explain how that element is reflected by directly referring to the story. Next to any element you feel is not fulfilled by the story, explain your reasons for that position. Story Link: https://www.espn.com/espnw/news-commentary/story/_/id/7985309/malika-willoughby-rosalind-ross-had-tragic-love-story-espn-magazine -Define hubris. List four SPECIFIC people in the story “Marathon Man” who were affected by Kip Litton’s hubris and next to each describe the effect of Litton’s hubris on that personHubris is excessive pride, overconfidence, lack of humility, and/or outrageous arrogance. Note that it is the degree that defines hubris. Confidence can be a positive, but when it is unfounded, extreme confidence, that is hubris. Story link: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/08/06/marathon-man
The Third Eye of the Lizard: Ray Gonzalez
This entire writing
Question The Third Eye of the Lizard: Ray Gonzalez
This entire writing from Gonzalez expresses a complex relationship between him and growing up in El Paso. How he would shoot lizards with his friends while growing up and all of the other adventures and stories that came from it. He even felt “powerful knowing I was a successful hunter”. (p. 1028) Eventually this relationship evolves as he becomes older. -What event changes Gonzalez’s mind on hunting the lizards in the desert? -Is this traumatic event something that you personally have had happen or was this never a mindset you had growing up? The Gifts: Richard NelsonIn this segment from Nelson’s writing there are generations of experience that are shared from Nelson growing up and his exposure to the Koyukon and Eskimo way of life. How they give back to nature and how he himself has grown to use many of practices that they have taught him. He even asks “Can we borrow from an ancient wisdom to structure a new relationship between ourselves and the environment?” (p.799) -How does Nelson respect the animals in relation to Gonzalez’s relationship with hunting growing up? -Do you think that these are practices that many of us should have today when it comes to not only respecting animals, but caring for the environment? Why or why not?
analyzes one of the short works we read in Weeks 1-2 (this must be a primary work and not an
analyzes one of the short works we read in Weeks 1-2 (this must be a primary work and not an analysis piece; in other words, you may not analyze Schechter, Halttunen, Black, Browder, or Friedman). Instructions: you will analyze this work from a literary standpoint, using critical lenses, literary elements, or other approaches. Remember: this is not simply “What you think” as a consumer; instead, this is a chance to examine the literary forces at play (character, theme, symbolism, language, etc.). First person language is acceptable on a limited basis, but avoid “I think”/”I believe” statements. You should use only the primary text for this analysis; do not do any outside research and especially do not Google your piece – this is not a research paper. Length: 1,000 words (about 4-5 pages, including a Works Cited page citing your snigle source). Graded using the literary analysis rubric. IMPORTANT: remember that you are analyzing this as a literary work, NOT analyzing the crime. This should not resemble a psychology, sociology, or criminology paper. It may help to imagine it as fiction to ensure you do not speculate outside of the course guidelines. For example, it is not appropriate to write a paper about whether Lizzie Borden truly killed her parents, or why children kill their parents. It IS appropriate to write a paper that discusses how newspapers portrayed or characterized Borden, based on the language provided.
Essay Writing at AllEssays.Online
Review This Service